Rota's basis conjecture

Importance: High ✭✭✭
Author(s): Rota, Gian-Carlo
Subject: Combinatorics
» Matrices
Recomm. for undergrads: no
Posted by: mdevos
on: October 6th, 2007

\begin{conjecture} Let $V$ be a vector space of dimension $n$ and let $B_1,\ldots,B_n \subseteq V$ be bases. Then there exist $n$ disjoint transversals of $B_1,\ldots,B_n$ each of which is a base. \end{conjecture}

This very pretty conjecture of Rota has a number of interesting extensions. One (obvious) extension is to matroids, and indeed, Rota conjectured this generalization (just replace the vector space $V$ of dimension $n$ by a matroid $M$ of rank $n$). This generalization has received some recent attention: Geelen and Humphries [GH] proved the special case when $M$ is a paving matroid, Geelen and Webb [GW] proved that in general there exist $\sqrt{n}$ disjoint transversals which are bases, and Aharoni and Berger [AB] used their beautiful "intersection of a matroid and a simplicial complex" theorem to prove that the union of the bases can be partitioned into $2n$ partial independent transversals. Another generalization of Rota's basis conjecture is the following.

\begin{conjecture}[Kahn] Let $V$ be a vector space of dimension $n$ and for $1 \le i \le n$ and $1 \le j \le n$ let $B_{i,j}$ be a basis. Then we may choose a vector $b_{i,j}$ from each basis $B_{i,j}$ so that in the matrix $\{ b_{i,j} \}_{1 \le i \le n, 1 \le j \le n}$, every row and every column is a basis. \end{conjecture}

To the best of my (M. DeVos') knowledge, this conjecture may generalize to matroids as well. There is another conjecture which implies Rota's basis conjecture which is far less obvious. In fact, Rota's conjecture (for even $n$ and characteristic zero) is implied by Alon and Tarsi's \OPrefnum[Even vs. odd latin squares conjecture]{636}. This implication was first discovered by Rota and Huang [RH] (Rota had himself made another conjecture equivalent to that of Alon and Tarsi), and a very transparent proof of this fact based on a polynomial identity is given by Shmuel Onn [O].

Thanks to this last implication, partial results on the Alon-Tarsi conjecture show that Rota's basis conjecture holds whenever $n$ has the form $n=2^r(p+1)$ or $n=2^rp$ where $p$ is an odd prime [D1], [D2], [Z].


[AB] R. Aharoni, E. Berger, The intersection of a matroid and a simplicial complex. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 358 (2006), no. 11, 4895--4917 \MRhref{MR2231877}.

[AT] N. Alon, M. Tarsi, \href[Coloring and Orientations of Graphs]{}. Combinatorica 12, 125-143, 1992 \MRhref{MR1179249}

[D1] A. Drisko, On the number of even and odd Latin squares of order $p+1$, Adv. Math. 128 (1997), no. 1, 20--35. \MRhref{MR1451417}

[D2] A. Drisko, \href[Proof of the Alon-Tarsi conjecture for $n=2\sp rp$]{}. Electron. J. Combin. 5 (1998) \MRhref{MR1624999}.

[GH] J. Geelen, and P. J. Humphries, \href[Rota's basis conjecture for paving matroids]{}. SIAM J. Discrete Math. 20 (2006), no. 4, 1042--1045 \MRhref{MR2272246}.

[GW] J. Geelen, and K. Webb, \href[On Rota's basis conjecture]{}

*[HR] R. Huang and G-C Rota, On the relations of various conjectures on Latin squares and straightening coefficients. Discrete Math. 128 (1994), no. 1-3, 225--236. \MRhref{MR1271866}.

[O] S. Onn, \href[A colorful determinantal identity, a conjecture of Rota, and Latin squares]{}. Amer. Math. Monthly 104 (1997), no. 2, 156--159. \MRhref{MR1437419}.

[W] M. Wild, On Rota's problem about $n$ bases in a rank $n$ matroid. Adv. Math. 108 (1994), no. 2, 336--345. \MRhref{MR1296517}.

[Z] P. Zappa, The Cayley determinant of the determinant tensor and the Alon-Tarsi Conjecture, Adv. Appl. Math. 19 (1997), 31--44.

* indicates original appearance(s) of problem.

Rota's Basis Conjecture is still open

Dear Jon Noel, I believe that the following statement that you added to this posting on Aug. 28, 2013 is incorrect:

“It has been announced that Rota's Basis Conjecture has been proved by Geelen, Gerards and Whittle (2013). The proof reportedly applies a Theory of Matroid Minors developed by the authors.”

The \href[announcement]{} you referred to is actually regarding a different famous conjecture, called \Def {Rota’s conjecture}, about forbidden minors of matroids. Besides the common author, the latter conjecture has nothing to do with \Def {Rota's Basis Conjecture} which is, as far as I am concerned, still open.

Consequently I’m removing your statement and returning the status of the problem to unsolved.


My mistake. Thanks.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.