Vertex Cover Integrality Gap

Importance: Medium ✭✭
Author(s): Atserias, Albert
Recomm. for undergrads: no
Posted by: dberwanger
on: October 2nd, 2012

\begin{conjecture} For every $\varepsilon > 0$ there is $\delta > 0$ such that, for every large $n$, there are $n$-vertex graphs $G$ and $H$ such that $G \equiv_{\delta n}^{\mathrm{C}} H$ and $\mathrm{vc}(G) \ge (2 - \varepsilon) \cdot \mathrm{vc}(H)$. \end{conjecture}

Here $\equiv^{\mathrm{C}}_{k}$ denotes indistinguishability in $k$-variable first-order logic with counting quantifiers, and $\mathrm{vc}(G)$ denotes the cardinality of the minimum vertex-cover of $G$. By~[1], $G \equiv_{3}^{\mathrm{C}} H$ implies $\mathrm{vc}(G) \leq 2 \cdot \mathrm{vc}(H)$. Also by~[1] a positive answer would imply that an integrality gap of $2-\varepsilon$ resists $\delta n$ levels of Sherali-Adams linear programming relaxations of vertex-cover, on $n$-vertex graphs. It is known that such a gap resists $n^{\delta}$ levels~[2]. What we ask would let us replace $n^{\delta}$ by $\delta n$. If improving over $n^{\delta}$ were not possible, then we could approximate vertex-cover by a factor better than~$2$ in subexponential time (i.e. $2^{n^{o(1)}}$). Approximating vertex-cover by a factor better than~1.36 is NP-hard~[3], and approximating vertex-cover by factor better than~2 is UG-hard~[4], where UG stands for Unique Games (from the Unique Games Conjecture); but note that UG-hardness does not rule out subexponential-time algorithms because UG itself is solvable in subexponential time~[5]

% You may use many features of TeX, such as % arbitrary math (between $...$ and $$...$$) % \begin{theorem}...\end{theorem} environment, also works for question, problem, conjecture, ... % % Our special features: % Links to wikipedia: \Def {mathematics} or \Def[coloring]{Graph_coloring} % General web links: \href [The On-Line Encyclopedia of Integer Sequences]{http://www.research.att.com/~njas/sequences/}

Bibliography

[1] A. Atserias and E. Maneva. \textit{Sherali-Adams Relaxations and Indistinguishability in Counting Logics}, in Proc. 3rd ACM ITCS, pp. 367-379, 2012.

[2] M. Charikar, K. Makarychev and Y. Makarychev. \textit{Integrality Gaps for Sherali-Adams Relaxations}, in Proc. 41st ACM STOC, pp. 283-292, 2009.

[3] I. Dinur and S. Safra. \textit{On the Hardness of Approximating Minimum Vertex-Cover}, Annals of Mathematics, 162(1):439-485, 2005.

[4] S. Khot and O. Regev. \textit{Vertex cover might be hard to approximate to within 2-epsilon}, J. Comput. Syst. Sci. 74(3):335-349, 2008.

[5] S. Arora, B. Barak, and D. Steurer. \textit{Subexponential Algorithms for Unique Games and Related problems}, in Proc. 51th IEEE FOCS, pp. 563-572, 2010.}


* indicates original appearance(s) of problem.