**Question**What is the minimum number of colours such that every complete geometric graph on vertices has an edge colouring such that:

- \item[Variant A] crossing edges get distinct colours, \item[Variant B] disjoint edges get distinct colours, \item[Variant C] non-disjoint edges get distinct colours, \item[Variant D] non-crossing edges get distinct colours.

Let be a set of points in the plane with no three collinear. Draw a straight line-segment between each pair of points in . We obtain the *complete geometric graph* with vertex set , denoted by .

Two edges in are either:

- \item

*adjacent*if they have a vertex in common, \item

*crossing*if they intersect at a point in the interior of both edges. \item

*disjoint*if they do not intersect.

Let , , and be the minimum number of colours for the four variants.

**Variant A:** Here each colour class is a plane subgraph. Since there are point sets for which edges are pairwise crossing, . For an upper bound, say . Colour each edge with by colour . Each colour class is a non-crossing star. So . Bose et al [BHRW] improved this upper bound to .

**Conjecture.** for some .

**Variant B:** Here edges receiving the same colour must intersect. So each colour class is a geometric thrackle. Since there are point sets for which edges are pairwise disjoint, . The -colouring given in Variant A also works here. So .

**Conjecture.** for some .

**Variant C:** Here each colour class is a plane matching. So each colour class has at most edges, and thus at least colours are always needed. Thus . Araujo [ADHNU] proved an upper bound of .

**Conjecture.** .

**Strong Conjecture.** .

**Variant D:** (This variant was recently mentioned in [Mat].) Here edges receiving the same colour must cross. Each colour class is called a *crossing family* [ADHNU]. Every edge in any triangulation of requires its own colour. So if the convex hull of has only three points, then at least colours are needed. Thus .

**Conjecture.** A super-linear number of colours are always needed; i.e., as .

A better lower bound is obtained by taking in convex position. Then is the minimum number of colours [KK]. I am not aware of any non-trivial upper bound for arbitrary point sets .

## Bibliography

[ADHNU] G. Araujo, A. Dumitrescu, F. Hurtado, M. Noy, J. Urrutia, On the chromatic number of some geometric type Kneser graphs, *Computational Geometry: Theory & Applications* 32(1):59–69, 2005 MathSciNet

[BHRW] Prosenjit Bose, Ferran Hurtado, Eduardo Rivera-Campo, David R. Wood. Partitions of complete geometric graphs into plane trees, *Computational Geometry: Theory & Applications* 34(2):116-125, 2006. MathSciNet

[AEGKKPS] B. Aronov, P. Erdos, W. Goddard, D.J. Kleitman, M. Klugerman, J. Pach, L.J. Schulman, Crossing families, *Combinatorica* 14(2):127–134, 1994. MathSciNet

[KK] Alexandr Kostochka and Jan Kratochvil. Covering and coloring polygon-circle graphs, *Discrete Math.* 163(1--3):299--305, 1997. MathSciNet

[Mat] Jiří Matoušek. Blocking visibility for points in general position. *Discrete Comput. Geom.* 42(2):219--223, 2009. MathSciNet

* indicates original appearance(s) of problem.